Burch-Lucich v. Lucich et al
Plaintiff: |
Beau Burch-Lucich |
Defendant: |
Gary L. Lucich, Marcae Lucich, Michelle Lucich Niece, Lucich Family Limited Partnership and Northwest Funding, LLC |
Case Number: |
1:2013cv00218 |
Filed: |
May 9, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Office: |
Boise - Southern Office |
County: |
Canyon - Southern |
Presiding Judge: |
Ronald E. Bush |
Nature of Suit: |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
June 16, 2015 |
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for attorney fees and costs 66 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is granted to the extent plaintiffs seek $7,112.00 in attorney fees from defense counsel. It is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
March 31, 2015 |
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for partial summary judgment 48 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
January 5, 2015 |
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion to compel 41 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant's motion to compel 40 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion 45 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
March 11, 2014 |
Filing
32
JOINT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 19 Stipulation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
February 7, 2014 |
Filing
30
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER.Completion of Discovery due by 4/30/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 7/30/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
October 31, 2013 |
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. 6 ) is DENIED. Defendants' motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. 6 ) is DENIED at this time. The parties shall submit simu ltaneous briefs, not to exceed five pages, as to whether the trial discussed in this order should be a bench trial or a jury trial. These briefs shall be filed within 14 days after this order is signed. Discovery on the limited issue of whether an ar bitration agreement exists shall be completed within 60 days of date this order is signed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
October 30, 2013 |
Filing
17
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Plan to be filed by 11/15/2013. Amended Pleadings due by 1/6/2014. Completion of Discovery due by 2/28/2014. Joinder of Parties due by 1/6/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 6/6/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?