Retirement Security Plan and Trust v Colonial Surety Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Idaho District Court Retirement Security Plan and Trust v Colonial Surety Company

Retirement Security Plan and Trust v Colonial Surety Company

Plaintiff:	Retirement Security Plan and Trust
Defendant:	Colonial Surety Company
Case Number:	1:2013cv00298
Filed:	July 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 22, 2016	Filing 68 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint to Add Claim for Punitive Damages 53 is DENIED. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact In-Court Deputy Jamie Bracke within one wee k following receipt of this order to make arrangements for a telephonic scheduling conference between counsel and the Court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
February 17, 2015	Filing 50 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 46 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's Motion for Protective Order 47 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 22, 2016

Filing 68 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint to Add Claim for Punitive Damages 53 is DENIED. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact In-Court Deputy Jamie Bracke within one wee k following receipt of this order to make arrangements for a telephonic scheduling conference between counsel and the Court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

February 17, 2015

Filing 50 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 46 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's Motion for Protective Order 47 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Retirement Security Plan and Trust v Colonial Surety Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Retirement Security Plan and Trust
Represented By:	Matthew T. Christensen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Colonial Surety Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?