Falash v. Inspire Academics, Inc. et al
| Thomas W. Falash |
| Inspire Academics, Inc., Connections Academy of Idaho, LLC, Connections Education, LLC, Jill Hamilton, Diana Plane, Marcia Rowe, Gerald Chouinard and Tonya Wesley |
| 1:2014cv00223 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS RENEWED MOTION FORSUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 50) granting in part and denying in part 50 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants 28 Affirmative Defenses and Improper Responses to the Complaint (Docket No. 29 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as follows: Defendants Sixth and Fourteenth Affirmative Defenses are stricken. In these limited respects only, Plaintiffs Motion to Strike is granted. All of Defendants other Affirmative Defenses remain intact; in these respects,Plaintiffs Motion to Strike is denied. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
