Clark v. Bank of America N.A.

Clark v. Bank of America N.A.

Plaintiff:	Sheila Clark
Defendant:	Bank of America N.A.
Case Number:	1:2014cv00232
Filed:	June 13, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Payette - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2017	Filing 80 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (Docket No. 70 ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Docket No. 70 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
March 27, 2015	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:Defendant's Motion 4 is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint on or before 4/24/2015. A telephone scheduling conference is set for 5/1 1/2015 at 10:30 a.m. Defendant's counsel and Plaintiff shall submit a stipulated litigation plan on or before 5/1/2015. ADR shall be completed by 9/11/2015. Defendant's Motion 5 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion 13 is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2017

Filing 80 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (Docket No. 70 ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Docket No. 70 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

March 27, 2015

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:Defendant's Motion 4 is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint on or before 4/24/2015. A telephone scheduling conference is set for 5/1 1/2015 at 10:30 a.m. Defendant's counsel and Plaintiff shall submit a stipulated litigation plan on or before 5/1/2015. ADR shall be completed by 9/11/2015. Defendant's Motion 5 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion 13 is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Bank of America N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Clark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America N.A.
Represented By:	Amber N. Dina
Represented By:	Kelly Greene McConnell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?