VirTra Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, Inc.
VirTra Systems, Inc. |
FAAC, Inc. |
1:2014cv00319 |
August 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
B Lynn Winmill |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 REPORT on the determination of an action (Notice sent to USPTO) (Attachments: #1 judgment) (st) |
Filing 27 JUDGMENT. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, ANDDECREED, that the Stipulation #26 is APPROVED and the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff in this matter, including all claims for relief asserted therein is dismissed with prejudice; and the parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION of Dismissal by VirTra Systems, Inc.. (Huntsman, Robert) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer FAAC, Inc. answer due 4/30/2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
Filing 24 Eighth MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 5/7/2015 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 23 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. FAAC, Inc. answer due 4/16/2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
Filing 22 Seventh MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 4/27/2015 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 21 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All answers or other responses shall be filed on or before April 9, 2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
Filing 20 Sixth MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 3/30/2015 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer FAAC, Inc. answer due 3/3/2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
Filing 18 Fifth MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 3/2/2015 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 17 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer FAAC, Inc. answer due 2/9/2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
Filing 16 Fourth MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (unopposed) Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 1/29/2015 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 15 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. The answer or other response shall be filed on or before January 8, 2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dm) |
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. Case reassigned to Judge B. Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. Judge Ronald E. Bush no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:14-cv-00319-BLW. (st) |
The 60 day deadline has expired. Case has been reassigned to a District Judge. No more notice of availability or assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (st) |
Filing 14 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (unopposed) Chad W Lamer appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 12/15/2014 (Lamer, Chad) |
Filing 13 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting unopposed #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before November 24,2014. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (dg) |
Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Michael T Spink appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 11/17/2014 (Spink, Michael) |
Filing 11 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (st) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for FAAC, Inc. and VirTra Systems, Inc. re #5 Notice of Appearance and #1 Complaint. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 11/28/2014. (st) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Jon Beaupre for FAAC, Inc. Per General Order 206, out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 8 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting unopposed #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before October 24, 2014. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (dg) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Michael T Spink appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 10/17/2014 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Spink, Michael) |
Filing 6 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Jon Beaupre. ( Filing fee $ 225 receipt number 0976-1209870.)Michael T Spink appearing for Defendant FAAC, Inc.. Responses due by 10/17/2014 (Spink, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T Spink on behalf of FAAC, Inc. (Spink, Michael) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by VirTra Systems, Inc.. FAAC, Inc. served on 9/3/2014, answer due 9/24/2014. (Huntsman, Robert) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to FAAC, Inc.. (Print attached Summons for service.) (st) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent number(s)8,016,594 and 8,267,691 (Notice sent to USPTO) (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (st) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/6/2014 to attach correct document) (st). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FAAC, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1191941.), filed by VirTra Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Pat. No. 8,016,594, #2 Exhibit U.S. Pat. No. 8,267,691, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Huntsman, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: VirTra Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: VirTra Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert A Huntsman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FAAC, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jon Beaupre |
Represented By: | Michael T Spink |
Represented By: | Chad W Lamer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.