Bryant v. Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jeanne B. Bryant
Defendant: Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc
Case Number: 1:2014cv00339
Filed: August 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Boise - Southern Office
County: Valley - Southern
Presiding Judge: B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion to Alter or Amend Court's Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER. All exhibit lists, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, trial briefs, and motions in limine shall be filed with the Court on orbefore 2/4/2016. (Judicially Supervised Settlement Conference shall be held by 1/20/2016. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2016 01:30 PM in Boise - Courtroom 3 before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 2/17/2016 03:00 PM in Boise Chambers before Judge B. Lynn Winmill.). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Bryant's Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is DENIED. Bryant's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony 28 is DENIED. TMA's Motion for Summary Judgment 44 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in par t as explained above. The claim for unjust enrichment remains. Bryant's Motion for Summary Judgment 45 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Bryant's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 23 is DENIED. Tamarack's Alternative Motion to Amend Case Management Order and Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend the Counterclaim 26 is DEEMED MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
January 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Strike 10 is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryant v. Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeanne B. Bryant
Represented By: Thomas J Angstman
Represented By: Matthew T. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc
Represented By: Stephen J. Lord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?