Bryant v. Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc.
| Jeanne B. Bryant |
| Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc |
| 1:2014cv00339 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Valley - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion to Alter or Amend Court's Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER. All exhibit lists, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, trial briefs, and motions in limine shall be filed with the Court on orbefore 2/4/2016. (Judicially Supervised Settlement Conference shall be held by 1/20/2016. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2016 01:30 PM in Boise - Courtroom 3 before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 2/17/2016 03:00 PM in Boise Chambers before Judge B. Lynn Winmill.). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Bryant's Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is DENIED. Bryant's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony 28 is DENIED. TMA's Motion for Summary Judgment 44 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in par t as explained above. The claim for unjust enrichment remains. Bryant's Motion for Summary Judgment 45 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Bryant's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 23 is DENIED. Tamarack's Alternative Motion to Amend Case Management Order and Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend the Counterclaim 26 is DEEMED MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Strike 10 is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bryant v. Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeanne B. Bryant | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J Angstman |
| Represented By: | Matthew T. Christensen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tamarack Municipal Association, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J. Lord |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
