Bingham v. Jefferson County et al
Plaintiff: Casey Bingham
Defendant: Jefferson County and Jefferson County Public Works Department
Case Number: 1:2015cv00245
Filed: July 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Pocatello - Eastern Office
County: Jefferson - Eastern
Presiding Judge: Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The Court will not rule on Jefferson County's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 31 ) at this time. Jefferson County shall have 30 days from the date of this decision to submit a second motion for summary judgment. T he traditional briefing scheduled shall apply and the Court will set a hearing for oral argument if necessary. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count I is dismissed. All other Counts remain. 2. The Defendant known as Jefferson County Public Works Department will be rem oved from the case caption as it is not a legal entity and simply a division of the other named Defendant, Jefferson County. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
February 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY (Docket No. 13), PLAINTIFF'S RULE 56(d) MOTION (Docket No. 15), and MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF COUNSEL (Docket No. 18). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff 9;s Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline (Docket No. 13 ) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion (Docket No. 15 ) is GRANTED; and 3. Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Counsel (Docket No. 18 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. Motions terminated: 18 MOTION to Strike, 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, and 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bingham v. Jefferson County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey Bingham
Represented By: Kevin Eugene Dinius
Represented By: Michael J Hanby II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County
Represented By: Sam L. Angell
Represented By: Blake G Hall
Represented By: Nathan R. Starnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Public Works Department
Represented By: Sam L. Angell
Represented By: Blake G Hall
Represented By: Nathan R. Starnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?