Scroggins v. Blades

Scroggins v. Blades

Petitioner:	Michael Shawn Scroggins
Respondent:	Randy Blades
Case Number:	1:2016cv00494
Filed:	November 14, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 27, 2023	Filing 24 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed on this date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED, this action is dismissed with prejudice, and judgment is entered in favor of Respondents. In addition, this case is hereby ordered closed.Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
December 8, 2022	Filing 14 SUCCESSIVE REVIEW ORDER and ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT - IT IS ORDERED:Petitioners construed motion to amend the petition (Dkt. 11 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court will re-docket Docket No. 11 as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which will be the operative petition in these consolidated cases.Petitioners Motion to Waive Clerks Record and Transcript Fees (Dkt. 12 ) is DENIED.The Clerk of Court will serve (via ECF) a copy of the Amended Petition (Dkt. 11 ), along with any attachments, together with a copy of this Order, on L. LaMont Anderson, on behalf of Respondent, at Mr. Andersons registered ECF address.Because it appears that Respondents State of Idaho and Canyon County District Court are not appropriate respondents in these c ase, see Habeas Rule 2(a), and because not all named parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, see Will iams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017), these consolidated cases are REASSIGNED to a United States District Judge. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 27, 2023

Filing 24 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed on this date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED, this action is dismissed with prejudice, and judgment is entered in favor of Respondents. In addition, this case is hereby ordered closed.Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)

December 8, 2022

Filing 14 SUCCESSIVE REVIEW ORDER and ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT - IT IS ORDERED:Petitioners construed motion to amend the petition (Dkt. 11 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court will re-docket Docket No. 11 as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which will be the operative petition in these consolidated cases.Petitioners Motion to Waive Clerks Record and Transcript Fees (Dkt. 12 ) is DENIED.The Clerk of Court will serve (via ECF) a copy of the Amended Petition (Dkt. 11 ), along with any attachments, together with a copy of this Order, on L. LaMont Anderson, on behalf of Respondent, at Mr. Andersons registered ECF address.Because it appears that Respondents State of Idaho and Canyon County District Court are not appropriate respondents in these c ase, see Habeas Rule 2(a), and because not all named parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, see Will iams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017), these consolidated cases are REASSIGNED to a United States District Judge. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scroggins v. Blades
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Scroggins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Blades
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?