Ellis v. Atencio et al
| Mark Lee Ellis |
| Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden |
| 1:2017cv00106 |
| March 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Ronald E. Bush |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Respondents Motion for Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART, and Claims 1 and 3 of the Petition are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion is denied without prejudice in remaining part to al low Petitioner to respond to this Order.2. Claims 2 and 4 of the Petition are procedurally defaulted, and the Courtdoes not have before it sufficient evidence to conclude that the cause andprejudice or actual innocence exception applies to excuse the default ofthese claims. Petitioner may respond to this Order within 28 days, settingforth any reason why his procedurally defaulted claims should be heard onthe merits. If Petitioner does not file a response, or if the response does not establish ca use and prejudice or actual innocence, Claims 2 and 4 will be dismissed for the reasons stated in this Order. 3. Respondent may reply to Petitioners response within 14 days after service of any such response. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
