Crow et al

Crow et al

Petitioner:	Lawrence James Crow
Respondent:	Keith Howard Yordy
Case Number:	1:2017cv00125
Filed:	March 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2019	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Claims 4(a), 4(b), and 4(d) of the Petition are DENIED. Because all other claims have already been dismissed, this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner may seek a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit by filing a request in that court. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
June 22, 2018	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (Dkt. 15 ) is GRANTED. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED. Claims 1, 2, 3, 4(c), and 4(e) are DISMISSED with prejudi ce. Petitioner's Motion for Application of Martinez v. Ryan (Dkt. 13 ) is DENIED. Respondent must file an answer to the remaining claims within 60 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2019

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Claims 4(a), 4(b), and 4(d) of the Petition are DENIED. Because all other claims have already been dismissed, this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner may seek a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit by filing a request in that court. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)

June 22, 2018

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (Dkt. 15 ) is GRANTED. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED. Claims 1, 2, 3, 4(c), and 4(e) are DISMISSED with prejudi ce. Petitioner's Motion for Application of Martinez v. Ryan (Dkt. 13 ) is DENIED. Respondent must file an answer to the remaining claims within 60 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crow et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Lawrence James Crow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Keith Howard Yordy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?