Edmo v. Corizon Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Adree Edmo
Defendant: Corizon Incorporated, Kevin Kempf, Richard Craig, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy, Scott Eliason, Murray Young and Catherine Whinnery
Case Number: 1:2017cv00151
Filed: April 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Boise - Southern Office
County: Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge: Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 358 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IDOC Defendants Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 346 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the attorney fee award (Dkt. 323 ) and all proceedings to enforce it are STAYED as to the following defendants: the Idaho Departmen t of Corrections; Henry Atencio; Jeff Zmuda; Howard Yordy; Al Ramirez; Richard Craig; and Rona Siegert. Upon the Ninth Circuits resolution of IDOC Defendants appeal of the attorney fee award (Dkt. 323 ), any party to this action may move the Court to lift this stay. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 345 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Defendants Motion to Stay (Dkt. 338 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Accordingly: Defendants request for an unbonded stay pending appeal is DENIED. Defendants request for an unbonded stay pending the conclus ion of mediation is GRANTED. The attorneys fee award (Dkt. 323 ) and all proceedings to enforce it are temporarily STAYED as to all Defendants. IDOC Defendants Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 342 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Defendants Joint Motion to Exceed Page Limit (Dkt. 343 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 337 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - To the extent Defendants Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Dkt. 332 ) sought to stay execution of the judgment the motion is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 334 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Defendants Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Dkt. 332 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
April 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 277 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO STAY re 272 Motion to Stay. IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion to Stay (Dkt. 272 ) is GRANTED. Defendants must preserve all relevant evidence, including electronically stored information subject to routine document retention removal practices, during the duration of this case. Defendants must continue to provide Plaintiff with presurgical treatment consistent with the Court's October 2019 presurgical order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 244 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' EXPEDITED MOTION TO STAY re 228 Expedited Motion to Stay. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Expedited Motion to Stay (Dkt. 228 ) is DENIED. The deadline for scheduling and completion of the first hair removal app ointment will remain vacated pending the Court's decision following the hearing described above. Defendants may file a motion requesting that the Court consider alternative means of remedying their established violation of the Plaintiff's E ighth Amendment rights. Such a motion must be filed by November 15, 2019. Plaintiffs shall respond with any briefs, affidavits, or other evidentiary materials they wish to submit by November 20, 2019. A hearing on Defendants' motion will be conducted on November 21, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 196 ORDER It is hereby ORDERED: The preliminary mandatory relief set forth in the Court's decision at Docket No. 149 is RENEWED. The Court clarifies that as part of its ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction, it also granted permanent i njunctive relief. The Court further clarifies that it concluded, and expressly incorporated into its final decision, that Plaintiff succeeded on the merits of her Eighth Amendment claim for permanent injunctive relief. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 193 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Indicative Ruling Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 62.1 and 60(a) (Dkt. 185 ) is DENIED as unnecessary. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
March 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 175 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants Joint Motion to Stay Order [Dkt. 149 ] Pending Appeal (Dkt. 156 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 149 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 62 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants are ordered to provide Plaintiff with adequate medical care, including gender confirmation sur gery. Defendants shall take all actions reasonably necessary to provide Ms. Edmo gender confirmation surgery as promptly as possible and no later than six months from the date of this order. However, given IDOCs implementation of an updated gender dy sphoria policy on October 5, 2018 that appears to provide Plaintiffs requested injunctive relief related to accessing gender-appropriate underwear, clothing, and commissary items, the Court will not address that relief at this time. This is without p rejudice to the plaintiffs right to raise the issue in the future, should IDOC revoke the new policy or if the implementation of the policy results in ongoing violations. 2. The Courts Deputy, Jamie Bracke, is directed to set a telephonic status conference in this case no later than two weeks after this decision issues. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Stipulation to Seal Declaration of Krina L. Stewart (Dkt. 102 ) is GRANTED. 2. Motion to Seal Ex 12 (Dkt. 112 ) & Motion to Seal Clinical Pathway: Gender Dysphoria Document (Dkt. 119) are GRANTED. 3. Motion to Seal Confidential PSI Documents (Dkt. 120 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER - Final Witness Lists due by 10/3/2018. Final Exhibit Lists due by 10/5/2018. A final transcript of the hearing will be provided to counsel on or before 10/19/2018. Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law due by 10/26/2018. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER FOR RULE 35 EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF re 79 Stipulation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 SCHEDULING ORDER approving 72 Stipulation. Fact Discovery due by 8/31/2018. If the Defendants wish to file a brief with the Court in response to Plaintiffs 62 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, then Defendants shall file their response(s) on or b efore September 14, 2018. If the Plaintiff elects to file a reply brief, the reply shall be filed on or before September 28, 2018. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants First Motion for Dispositive Relief (Dkt. 39 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edmo v. Corizon Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adree Edmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Kempf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rona Siegert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard Keith Yordy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Eliason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murray Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Catherine Whinnery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?