Walck v. Blades

Walck v. Blades

Petitioner:	Mitchell Lee Walck
Respondent:	Randy Blades
Case Number:	1:2017cv00194
Filed:	May 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2019	Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 3 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issu e. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Petitioner files a timely notice of appeal, the Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of the notice of appeal, together with this Order, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner may seek acertificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit by filing a request in that court. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (jd)
September 5, 2018	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Respondents Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. 2. Respondents Motions for Extension of Time to File Response (Dkts. 45 , 46 ) are GRANTED. 3. Petitioners request to take po ssession of his CD ROM disc (contained in Dkt. 44 ) is DENIED. 4. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims within 90 days after entry of this Order.... Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly called a traverse), containing a brief reb utting Respondent's answer and brief, which shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. Respondent has the option of filing a sur-reply within 14 days after service of the reply. At that point, the case shall be deemed ready for a final decision. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2019

Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 3 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issu e. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Petitioner files a timely notice of appeal, the Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of the notice of appeal, together with this Order, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner may seek acertificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit by filing a request in that court. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (jd)

September 5, 2018

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Respondents Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. 2. Respondents Motions for Extension of Time to File Response (Dkts. 45 , 46 ) are GRANTED. 3. Petitioners request to take po ssession of his CD ROM disc (contained in Dkt. 44 ) is DENIED. 4. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims within 90 days after entry of this Order.... Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly called a traverse), containing a brief reb utting Respondent's answer and brief, which shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. Respondent has the option of filing a sur-reply within 14 days after service of the reply. At that point, the case shall be deemed ready for a final decision. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walck v. Blades
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mitchell Lee Walck
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Blades
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?