Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability, Inc. et al v. Schultz et al
| Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability, Inc., Charlene K. Quade, Rachel Holty, Brittany Sandoval and Cristian Sandoval |
| Thomas M. Schultz, Chris Beck, Margaret Chipman, Sid Cellan, Jim Classen and Ken Smith |
| 1:2017cv00264 |
| June 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Award of Fees and to Extend the Time in Which to File (Dkt. 55 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (alw)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Motion toAlter or Amend the Judgement or Alternatively, for Partial Relief from the Judgment(Dkt. 43 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment beentered, and that this be closed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
