Saint Alphonsus Health Alliance, Inc. et al v. Corizon, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Saint Alphonsus Health Alliance, Inc and Saint Alphonsus Health System, Inc.
Defendant: Corizon, LLC and Corizon Health, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00183
Filed: April 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Boise - Southern Office
County: Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge: Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 101 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Corizon's Motion to Compel Payor Rate Data (Dkt. 44 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as outlined above. The Hospitals' Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 53 ) is GRANTED. Ada County's Motion to Q uash (Dkt. 55 ) is GRANTED. None of the Third Parties need respond to Corizon's subpoenas. Corizon's Motion to Compel Chargemaster Rates (Dkt. 81 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as outlined above. Corizon's Motion for Discov ery and to Appoint Special Master (Dkt. 94 ) is DENIED. St. Luke's Motion to Seal (Dkt. 96 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The joint Motion to Consolidate Cases (Dkt. 28 ) is GRANTED. Case No. 1:18-cv-00289-DCN, St. Luke's Health System, Ltd, et al. v.Corizon, LLC, et al., is hereby CONSOLIDATED with the above captioned case. The pa rties will submit any and all future filings only in Case No. 1:18-cv-00183-DCN which is now the LEAD CASE. The Parties will use the case caption as it appears herein in all future pleadings. The Clerk of the Court shall place a signed copy of th is order in the file of Case No. 1:18-cv- 00289-DCN. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-00183-DCN, 1:18-cv-00289-DCN(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saint Alphonsus Health Alliance, Inc. et al v. Corizon, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saint Alphonsus Health Alliance, Inc
Represented By: Keely E. Duke
Represented By: Bryan A Nickels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saint Alphonsus Health System, Inc.
Represented By: Keely E. Duke
Represented By: Bryan A Nickels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?