Prather et al v. KST Coating, a unit of The Sherwin-Williams Company
| Sondra Prather and Ronald Prather |
| The Sherwin-Williams Company and KST Coating |
| 1:2018cv00367 |
| August 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Valley - Southern |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR must be held by 5/31/2019. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/15/2019. Discovery due by 4/26/2019. Joinder of Parties due by 12/15/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 5/10/2019.). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by KST Coating. (Kraft, Steven) |
| Filing 8 DISCOVERY PLAN by KST Coating Stipulated Proposed. (Kraft, Steven) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint Amended by KST Coating.(Kraft, Steven) |
| Filing 6 FIRST RETURN MAIL undelivered as to Ronald and Sondra Prather re: #2 Notice of Availability Setting Deadline filed by KST Coating, Sondra Prather, Ronald Prather (jp) (per post office, no mail receptacle) |
|
Filing 5
LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/15/2018 01:30 PM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. On or before 10/8/18, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KST Coating. (Kraft, Steven) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT by Defendant KST Coating re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Service Documents, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Additional Documents)(Kraft, Steven) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for KST Coating, Ronald Prather, Sondra Prather re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/22/2018. (jp) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #1 Notice of Removal, filed by KST Coating was filed incorrectly in this case. All state court documents shall be individual attachments to the Notice of Removal. Please re-file using "Supplement" so you do not get charged again. Attach each state court document separately as follows: 1) Attach Notice of Removal as main document. 2) Attach state court complaint. 3) Attach state court service documents. 4) Attach civil cover sheet. 5) Attach any pending motions. 6) Attach state court docket sheet. 7) Attach any additional documents. (jp) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jp) |
| RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (jp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Sherwin-Williams Company from Fourth Judicial District of Valley County, case number CV43-17-371.(Filing fee $400 receipt number0976-1775189.), filed by The Sherwin-Williams Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Kraft, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
