Douglas v. Protective Life Insurance Company et al
| Elizabeth Douglas |
| Business Entity Does I-X and Protective Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv00380 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Candy W Dale |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Docket Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Candy W. Dale: Appearance by Brian Hilverda for the Plaintiff; Nicole Cannon for the Defendant. Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 10/22/2018. Court noted a Stipulated Litigation Plan was filed in this matter. Consent process discussed. (Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/18/2019 10:00 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale.) Case Management Order forthcoming. Time in Court 9:32-9:39 AM. (Hearing not recorded.) (at) |
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Standard) - Amended Pleadings/Joinder of Parties due by 1/11/2019. Fact Discovery due by 5/1/2019. Mediation shall take place by 6/12/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 6/28/2019. Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/18/2019 10:00 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by Elizabeth Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Plan)(Hilverda, Brian) |
|
Filing 6
LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. On or before 10/15/2018, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2018 09:30 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Protective Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Protective Life Corporation, Corporate Parent Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. for Protective Life Insurance Company.. (Cannon, Nicole) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Elizabeth Douglas and Protective Life Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/29/2018. (st) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial by Protective Life Insurance Company.(Cannon, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA by Defendant Protective Life Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Cannon, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Protective Life Insurance Company from District Court Twin Falls County, case number CV42-18-3066.(Filing fee $400 receipt number0976-1778868.), filed by Protective Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint State Court Complaint, #3 Summons Summons Served, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Affidavit Nicole Cannon in Support of Notice of Removal)(Cannon, Nicole) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (st) |
| RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - Protective Life Insurance Company served on 8/28/2018. (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (st) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
