Welsh v. United States of America et al
| Thomas E. Welsh |
| Eskridge Enterprises, LLC, John Doe I-X, John Doe, Thomas Yang and United States of America |
| 1:2018cv00455 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas E. Welsh. Eskridge Enterprises, LLC served on 11/12/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. (Schmitz, Randall) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas E. Welsh. United States of America served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. (Schmitz, Randall) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Eskridge Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Yang. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued - Eskridge Enterprises, LLC)(cjs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1800291.), filed by Thomas E. Welsh. (Attachments: #1 Summons, United States of America, #2 Summons, Thomas Yang, #3 Summons, Eskridge Enterprises, #4 Cover Sheet)(Schmitz, Randall) Modified on 10/18/2018 to edit text (cjs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
