Ziemer v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rachel Elaine Ziemer |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2018cv00528 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Candy W Dale |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1) Petitioners motion for reconsideration (Dkt. #7 ), and renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #8 ), are GRANTED.2) Petitioner shall be allowed to proceed without the payment of filing fees and fees for service of process.3) Petitioners application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1 ), is VACATED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Rachel Elaine Ziemer. Responses due by 1/24/2019 (km) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order, by Petitioner Rachel Elaine Ziemer. Responses due by 1/24/2019 ( km) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jp)(set of 3 of each: Summons, dkt 2 and dkt 5 given to USMS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Within 30 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must pay the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to pay the fee on or before 1/4/19, will result in entry of a recommendation to the Court that Petitioner be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and that the action be dismissed without prejudice. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rachel Elaine Ziemer. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (alw)
|
| Filing 3 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw) Modified on 11/28/2018 (alw). |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW -, filed by Rachel Elaine Ziemer. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(alw) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Rachel Elaine Ziemer. Responses due by 12/17/2018 (alw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ziemer v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rachel Elaine Ziemer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
