United State of America et al v. Rafter H Construction LLC et al
| United State of America, Big-D Corporation and Big-D Construction Corp |
| Rafter H Construction LLC, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2018mc10002 |
| January 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for judgment debtor exam (docket no. 16 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the motion for service (docket no. 17 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that th e Clerk shall send out a Notice of Hearing fora judgment debtor examination of Rafter H Construction LLC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that at the judgment debtor examination, a representative of Rafter H Construction LLC, with authority to speak for the c ompany, shall answer questions concerning Rafters property and assets. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Rafter H Construction LLC is restrained and enjoined from selling, loaning, giving away or otherwise disposing of its non-exempt assets and property pe nding this hearing. Failure to comply with this Order may result in contempt proceeding against Rafter H Construction LLC. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
