Ullrich v. Idaho State Attorney General's Office et al
Stephen Ullrich |
Idaho State Attorney General's Office, Idaho Board of Corrections and Idaho Department of Corrections |
1:2019cv00188 |
May 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp) |
Filing 8 PETITION for Review by Plaintiff Stephen Ullrich. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (jp) |
Filing 7 MOTION for an Order of Contempt by Plaintiff Stephen Ullrich. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (jp) |
Filing 6 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jp) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Bifurcate by Plaintiff Stephen Ullrich. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (jp) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Permission to Proceed; and for Relief from Order by Plaintiff Stephen Ullrich. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (jp) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Idaho Board of Corrections, Idaho Department of Corrections, Idaho State Attorney General's Office, filed by Stephen Ullrich.(jp) |
Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stephen Ullrich. (jp) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Ullrich. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (jp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.