Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
| Nathan Byerly |
| Idaho Department of Correction, State of Idaho, Henry Atencio, Christensen and Idaho Board of Correction |
| 1:2019cv00228 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND WITHDRAWAL OF INMATE FILING FEE FROM PRISON TRUST ACCOUNT. Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) cc: Josh Tewalt, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, Attn: Inmate Accounts, 1299 N Orchard, Suite 110, Boise ID 83706.
|
| Filing 4 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathan Byerly. (ckh) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nathan Byerly. Responses due by 8/15/2019 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (ckh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nathan Byerly.(jp)(efiled on 6/11/19. Mailed Stmt of TFA & App for IFP forms to Mr. Byerly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
