Bosse v. Blades et al
Michael Earl Bosse |
Randy Blades, RDU Staff, Officer Lee and RDU Sargeants 8 House |
1:2019cv00271 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION and Affidavit for Permission to Proceed on Partial Payment of Court Fees (Prisoner) by Plaintiff Michael Earl Bosse. Responses due by 9/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Letter) (ckh) |
Filing 8 Letter from Michael Bosse requesting a blank pleading form (mailed a copy in 1:19-cv-270 case). (ckh) |
Filing 7 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Earl Bosse. (ckh) |
Filing 6 PRISONER APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Earl Bosse. Responses due by 8/12/2019 (ckh) |
Filing 5 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Subpoena of RDU- Camera Footage Files and Corizon Medical Filesby Plaintiff Michael Earl Bosse. Responses due by 7/31/2019 (jp) |
Filing 3 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jp) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael Earl Bosse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jp) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Earl Bosse. Responses due by 7/31/2019 (jp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.