Kurt Benkenstein v. Andrew Saul
| Kurt Benkenstein |
| Andrew Saul |
| 4:2019cv00404 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Candy W Dale |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT: Civil Filing Fee Fee Received $400.00, receipt #IDX25402 Paid in Full. (jld) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kurt Benkenstein. SSA served on 10/28/2019, answer due 1/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harper, Barbara) |
Filing 10
ORDER - Petitioners Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED. Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the statutory filing fee of $400.00 on or before January 30, 2020 in order to be allowed to proceed. Failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of this case without further notice.Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Filing 9 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jd) |
| Filing 8 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Kurt Benkenstein and counsel for Andrew Saul re #6 Notice of Appearance and the #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/30/2019. (jd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick D Fripps on behalf of Andrew Saul (Fripps, Frederick) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd) |
|
Filing 4
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Notice of Reassignment and Case Number Change: Case was opened with incorrect division. Corrected to Eastern Division and case reassigned to Judge Dale. Please use case number 4:19-cv-00404-CWD for all future filings. (jd) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Barbara F Harper appearing for Plaintiff Kurt Benkenstein. Responses due by 11/7/2019 (Harper, Barbara) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Kurt Benkenstein This is a sealed document.. (Harper, Barbara) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Kurt Benkenstein. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Harper, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kurt Benkenstein v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kurt Benkenstein | |
| Represented By: | Barbara F Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
