Rosales v. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare et al
Alma Rosales |
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, Matt Wimmer, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and Russell Barron |
1:2019cv00426 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Orderby Plaintiff Alma Rosales. Responses due by 1/10/2020 (alw) |
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of 9 Order, has been served by First Class Mail at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on Alma Rosales, (alw) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Rosales' Motion to Seal (Dkt #8 ) is GRANTED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), Rosales' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. #4 ) shall be sealed from public view. The parties may still access the document. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (tb) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Seal Document #4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Alma Rosales. Responses due by 12/31/2019 (alw) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Rosales' Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is GRANTED. Rosales must pay $50.00 per month to the Clerk of Court, on or before the last day of each month, until the filing fee is paid in full. Rosales may proceed with service of the Summons of her Complaint in accordance with applicable procedures. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw) |
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number 6 Order was filed incorrectly in this case. Please disregard docket 6.(alw) |
Filing 6 *FILED IN WRONG CASE, DISREGARD* DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's Expedited Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkt. 17 ) is GRANTED. Defendant may file up to twenty-eight (28) pages in his Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 16 ). The Court will also extend the same courtesy to Plaintiff for its Reply - Plaintiff's Reply may contain up to eight (8) extra pages. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (tb) Modified on 11/14/2019 to show filed in wrong case (alw). |
Filing 5 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Alma Rosales. Responses due by 11/25/2019 (kt). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Plaintiff Alma Rosales. Responses due by 11/25/2019 (kt) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Russell Barron, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, MOLINA HEALTHCARE, Matt Wimmer, filed by Alma Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2019: #2 Letter from IDHW, #3 Letter from Alma Rosales to Food and Nutrition Service, #4 Message from the IDHW, #5 Emails to DHW regarding benefits, #6 Letter to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit) (kt). |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Alma Rosales. Responses due by 11/25/2019 (kt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.