Lilue v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tracy D. Lilue |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv00002 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ckh)
|
|
Filing 11
Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (ckh)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tracy D. Lilue. Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/21/2020, answer due 4/20/2020. (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Tracy D. Lilue and Commissioner of Social Security re #1 Petition for Review and #8 Notice of Appearance. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/6/2020. (ckh)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Change of Address by Joanne P Rodriguez (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 5
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Commissioner of Social Security Summons, #2 US Attorney General Summons) (ckh)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Brad D Parkinson appearing for Petitioner Tracy D. Lilue. Responses due by 1/24/2020 (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 2
Statement of Social Security Number by Tracy D. Lilue This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Tracy D. Lilue. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Parkinson, Brad)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lilue v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Joanne P Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tracy D. Lilue | |
| Represented By: | Brad D Parkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
