LeComte v. LeComte, et al.
Byron Douglas LeComte |
Wade LeRoux and Dawn Marie LeComte |
1:2020cv00014 |
January 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Motion for Service. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion (docket no. #4 ) is GRANTED, and that pursuant to FRCP 4(e)(1), the process of service of the complaint and summons filed and issued herein shall be allowed to be effectuated on defendants in the State of Washington, County of Whatcom, defendants' state and county of residence. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh) |
Filing 4 First MOTION for Service Out of State Raymond Douglas Schild appearing for Plaintiff Byron Douglas LeComte. Responses due by 1/30/2020 (Schild, Raymond) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons LeComte)(jd) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint filed by Byron Douglas LeComte. (Schild, Raymond) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1991802.), filed by Byron Douglas LeComte.(Schild, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.