Probst v. Adams County Sheriff Department et al
| Julia Vance Probst |
| Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, St. Lukes, United States Postal Service, Adams County Sheriff Department and Valley County Sheriff Department |
| 1:2020cv00032 |
| January 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Julia Vance Probst re #2 Complaint. (ckh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/20/2020: #1 Envelope) (ckh). |
| Filing 4 AMENDED APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Julia Vance Probst. Responses due by 3/18/2020. (ckh) |
Filing 3
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kt)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for violation of Civil Rights against Adams County Sheriff Department, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, St. Lukes, United States Postal Service, Valley County Sheriff Department, filed by Julia Vance Probst. (Attachments: #1 Petition to the United States Court)(kt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/21/2020: #2 Cover Letter) (kt). |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Julia Vance Probst. Responses due by 2/11/2020 (Attachments: #1 Additional information)(kt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
