Taylor v. Taylor et al
Larry Alan Taylor |
Kimberly Nagal, Nate Nagal and Eileen Taylor |
1:2020cv00168 |
April 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Larry Alan Taylor. Responses due by 2/9/2021 (Attachments: #1 copy of envelope)(jp) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Larry Alan Taylor (jp) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff Larry Alan Taylor. Responses due by 1/19/2021 (jp) |
Filing 9 Letter requesting a copy of the register of actions. (I mailed a copy of the register of actions to Mr. Taylor) (jd) |
RECEIPT: Civil Filing Fee Fee Received $ 350.00, receipt # IDX26987 Paid In Full on 10/13/20 (ch) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO INITIAL REVIEW ORDER filed by Larry Alan Taylor. (jp) |
|
|
|
Filing 4 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (kt) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COMPLAINT (Prisoner) against All Defendants, filed by Larry Alan Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Attachments)(kt) |
Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Alan Taylor. (kt) |
Filing 1 PRISONER APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Larry Alan Taylor. Responses due by 4/22/2020 (kt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.