Madrill v. Doe et al
| Adam M. Madrill |
| John Doe and Jane Does |
| 1:2020cv00415 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN MAIL undelivered as to Adam Madrill re: #5 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Application (ckh) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Adam M. Madrill. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff has 28 days to (1) submit a trust account statement as described above, or (2) pay the $400.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kt)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adam M. Madrill.(kt) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam M. Madrill. (kt) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Adam M. Madrill. Responses due by 9/10/2020 (kt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
