Mealer v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Carol Ann Mealer |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv00543 |
| November 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Candy W Dale |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carol Ann Mealer. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/7/2020, answer due 2/5/2021. (Parkinson, Brad) |
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale - ALL MATTERS in the above case are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale. Judge Dale is directed to conduct all necessary and proper proceedings pertaining thereto. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne) |
| Filing 6 A REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT JUDGE HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE(jd) |
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge B. Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:20-cv-00543-BLW. (jd) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons for Commissioner of Social Security, #2 Summons for Attorney General)(jd) |
|
Filing 4
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Commissioner of Social Security and counsel for Carol Ann Mealer re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/21/2020. (jd) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Carol Ann Mealer This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW - (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-2134063.), filed by Carol Ann Mealer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Parkinson, Brad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mealer v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Joanne P Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Carol Ann Mealer | |
| Represented By: | Brad D Parkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
