Guyon v. USA
| Richard Guyon |
| USA |
| 1:2020cv00585 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #7 Motion For Leave To File Overlength Response. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the request to file an overlength brief, giving the Government a 23-page limit. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (aa).
|
| Filing 7 SEALED MOTION Raymond E Patricco appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 3/3/2021 (Patricco, Raymond) |
| Filing 6 Sealed Document Re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Patricco, Raymond) Exhibits A-P received on 2/11/2021, file maintained in Clerk's Office (kt). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Government's Motion for an Order Granting a Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Extension of Time (Dkt. #3 ) is granted. The Government has 60 days from the date of this Order to file a response to Petitioners Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. #1 ). Defense counsel, Craig Atkinson, shall make himself available to answer material questions from the Government and provide an affidavit to the Government within 30 days from the date of this Order. Defense counsel, Katie Ball, shall make herself available to answer material questions from the Government and provide an affidavit to the Government within 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
|
| Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO ORDER Granting a Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Extension of Time (filed under seal) re #4 Order, filed by Richard Guyon. (cc: R Patricco & L Rodriguez) (jp) |
| Filing 3 SEALED MOTION Raymond E Patricco appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 1/26/2021 (Patricco, Raymond) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF FILING AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING MOTION PURSUANT TO 28 USC 2255. (Reference Criminal Case Number 1:18-cr-88-BLW) Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (jp)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) ( Criminal Action 1:18-cr-88-BLW.), filed by Richard Guyon.(jp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guyon v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Raymond E Patricco |
| Represented By: | Kevin T Maloney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Richard Guyon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
