Riddle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: Susie Lynn Riddle
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv00133
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Ronald E Bush
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Goldoftas on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Goldoftas, Lisa)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Susie Lynn Riddle. Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Parkinson, Brad)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jd)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Process Clerk, #2 Attorney General)(jd)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS - Petitioners In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #2 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Commissioner of Social Security and counsel for Susie Lynn Riddle re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/13/2021. (jd)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jd)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Statement of Social Security Number by Susie Lynn Riddle This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Brad D Parkinson appearing for Petitioner Susie Lynn Riddle. Responses due by 4/12/2021 (Parkinson, Brad)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Susie Lynn Riddle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Parkinson, Brad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riddle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Joanne P Rodriguez
Represented By: Lisa Goldoftas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Susie Lynn Riddle
Represented By: Brad D Parkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?