Cottrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mona Faye Cottrell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00140 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| David C Nye |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Bennett Watson on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Watson, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jp)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Judge Ronald E. Bush no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:21-cv-00140-DCN (jp)
|
|
The 21 day deadline has expired. Case has been reassigned to a District Judge. No more notice of assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (jp)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Commissioner of Social Security, Mona Faye Cottrell, SSA. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/15/2021. (kt)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing (kt)
|
|
Filing 4
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Brad D Parkinson appearing for Petitioner Mona Faye Cottrell. Responses due by 4/15/2021 (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 2
Statement of Social Security Number by Mona Faye Cottrell This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Mona Faye Cottrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Parkinson, Brad)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cottrell v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Joanne P Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Katherine Bennett Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mona Faye Cottrell | |
| Represented By: | Brad D Parkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
