Crosby v. Social Security Administration
Petitioner: Nicole Renee Crosby
Respondent: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv00151
Filed: April 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Referring Judge: B Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER finding as moot #10 Motion to Dismiss because it is procedurally improper, and duplicative of the petition for review. Petitioner is advised to review the Court's #4 Procedural Order. Further filings by Petitioner contrary to the procedure set forth in the Court's Order may be summarily dismissed.Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (copy of Order #14 and Procedural Order #4 caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (klw) Modified on 5/25/2021 (klw) to correct typographical error.
May 24, 2021 Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (kt)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. 8) is GRANTED. Petitioner will be allowed to proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the officers of the court shall issue and serve all process. The Clerk of Court is directed to deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service a Summons, a copy of the Second Petition for Review (Dkt. 9), and a copy of this Order, so the Marshals may effect service of process upon Respondent. The U.S. Marshals Service shall serve process on Respondent in accordance with Rule 4(i)(2) and accomplish service on or before 7/30/2021. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
May 21, 2021 Filing 11 Jurisdictional Statement by Nicole Renee Crosby (kt)
May 21, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Judge Willis Unfavorable Decision by Petitioner Nicole Renee Crosby. Motions referred to Candy W. Dale. Responses due by 6/14/2021 (kt)
May 21, 2021 Filing 9 SECOND PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Nicole Renee Crosby.(kt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/21/2021: #1 Unredacted) (kt).
May 21, 2021 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Nicole Renee Crosby.Motions referred to Candy W. Dale. Responses due by 6/11/2021 (kt)
May 21, 2021 Filing 7 Statement of Social Security Number by Nicole Renee Crosby. This is a sealed document. (kt)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Petitioner is therefore ORDERED to pay the initial filing fee of $402.00, or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, on or before June 18, 2021. If Petitioner fails to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: ALL MATTERS in the above case are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale. Judge Dale is directed to conduct all necessary and proper proceedings pertaining thereto. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
April 26, 2021 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge B. Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:21-cv-00151-BLW (kt)
April 26, 2021 The 21 day deadline has expired. Case has been reassigned to a District Judge. No more notice of assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (kt)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
April 2, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Nicole Renee Crosby re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/23/2021. (jp)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp)
April 2, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW, filed by Nicole Renee Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Documents transferred from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit)(jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crosby v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicole Renee Crosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?