Stoddard, et al. v. Idaho State Penitentiary, et al.
Daniel Paul Stoddard and Gen. of Gangland (lockdown) |
Idaho State Penitentiary and The Debi-Cake Program |
1:2021cv00215 |
May 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Order of Dismissal filed on this date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Additionally, this case is ordered closed. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 3 USAF AFFIDAVIT filed by Daniel Paul Stoddard. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(jd) |
Filing 2 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (lm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Idaho State Penitentiary, The Debi-Cake Program, filed by Daniel Paul Stoddard. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(lm) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/19/2021, with redacted version of complaint) (jd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.