Sivak v. Nye
Lacey Sivak |
Hon David C Nye |
1:2021cv00278 |
July 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
M Douglas Harpool |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Intent to Appeal by Lacey Sivak re 10 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, (alw) |
Filing 11 Letter from Lacey Sivak(alw) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motion for Reconsideration. After careful consideration, the Court denies the plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's #8 Order denying the plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (mem) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Reconsider re #8 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Lacey Sivak. Responses due by 8/26/2021 (alw) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (mem) |
Filing 7 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Petitioners Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 4 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee when Petitioner next receives funds in Petitioners inmate trust account. Within 60 days after entry of this Order, Petitioner must file an amended petition as described above. Signed by Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (mem) Modified on 7/27/2021 (mem). |
Filing 6 Emergency MOTION for Injunction/Protective Order by Plaintiff Lacey Sivak. Responses due by 8/12/2021 (alw) |
Filing 5 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lacey Sivak. (alw) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lacey Sivak. Responses due by 8/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 envelope)(alw) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is reassigned to Judge M. Douglas Harpool from the Western District of Missouri. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 2 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (lm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David C Nye filed by Lacey Sivak. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lm) |
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. This case has been reassigned to Judge Harpool. Please use case number 1:21-cv-278-MDH on all future pleadings. (st) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sivak v. Nye | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lacey Sivak | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hon David C Nye | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.