Freegard v. State of Idaho
Timothy Freegard |
State of Idaho and Warden Ramirez |
1:2021cv00323 |
August 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
David C Nye |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER and ORDER REQUIRING AMENDMENT. Petitioner's Motion to Extend Time for Filing of Opening of Case (Dkt. 6) and Motion to Extend One-Year Filing Deadline (Dkt. 11) are DENIED, because the Court does not have authority to extend the statute of limitations. The Court will not dismiss any claim as untimely at this early stage of the proceedings, but it may consider the statute of limitations issue at a later date. Within 60 days after entry of this Order, Petitioner must file an amended petition, which must comply with Habeas Rule 2(d) and must include all of the claims, whether exhausted or not, that Petitioner intends to raise in this action. The Clerk of Court will provide Petitioner with this Courts form 2254 petition. Petitioner is encouraged and expected to use that form to draft any amended petition. If Petitioner files an amended petition, the Court will consider Petitioners request to stay these proceedings. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt) |
Filing 12 ADDENDUM by Petitioner Timothy Freegard re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kt) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Extend One Year Filing Deadline by Petitioner Timothy Freegard. Responses due by 9/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(kt) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND REASSIGNMENT OF CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:21-cv-00323-DCN(kt) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT filed by Timothy Freegard. (kt) |
Filing 8 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (kt) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Timothy Freegard, Ramirez re #4 Petition. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/12/2021. (kt) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time for Filing of Opening of Case by Petitioner Timothy Freegard. Responses due by 9/2/2021 (kt) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Hold Petition in Stay and Abeyance by Petitioner Timothy Freegard. Responses due by 9/2/2021 (kt) |
Filing 4 28 U.S.C 2254 PETITION by Petitioner Timothy Freegard. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1 of 4, #3 Exhibit 2 of 4, #4 Exhibit 3 of 4, #5 Exhibit 4 of 4, #6 Affidavit, #7 Cover Letter)(kt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Timothy Freegard, State of Idaho re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/12/2021. (Phillips, Kelsey) |
Filing 2 ORDER of Conditional Filing (Phillips, Kelsey) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Timothy Freegard. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Phillips, Kelsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.