Hayes v. Idaho paralegal Barney et al
| Michael T Hayes |
| Idaho paralegal Barney, CPL Noble and ISCC Prison |
| 1:2021cv00377 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION. Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED. If Plaintiff does not pay the $402.002 filing fee within 14 days, this case may be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal if Plaintiff no longer intends to pursue this action, in which case no filing fee will be due. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
| Filing 4 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael T Hayes. (alw) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael T Hayes. Responses due by 10/15/2021 (alw) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kmp)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael T Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Appellant's Brief)(kmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
