Showalter v. Boise County, et al.
Robert D Showalter and Robert D. Showalter |
Boise County, Ryan T Stirm, Steven M Twilegar, Robert T Holmes, Boise County, Idaho, Ryan T. Stirm, Steven M. Twilegar and Robert T. Holmes |
1:2021cv00404 |
October 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER (STANDARD TRACK) - All dispositive motions shall be filed by August 26, 2022. All motions to amend pleadings and join parties, except for allegations of punitive damages, shall be filed on or before February 28, 2022. ADR must be held within 30 days after a decision on dispositive motions. All factual discovery will be completed by July 29, 2022. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE VACATING HEARING: The telephonic scheduling conference set for 11/29/2021 at 9:30 AM is VACATED. A scheduling order based on the parties' stipulated Litigation and Discovery Plans will be sent out at a later date. (ab) |
Filing 8 DISCOVERY PLAN by Boise County, Idaho, Robert T. Holmes, Ryan T. Stirm, Steven M. Twilegar . (Attachments: #1 Litigation Plan)(Naylor, Jacob) |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand filed by Robert D. Showalter.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/16/2021.(Coulter, Ronaldo) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Boise County, Idaho, Robert T. Holmes, Ryan T. Stirm, Steven M. Twilegar.(Naylor, Jacob) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Boise County, Idaho, Robert T. Holmes, Ryan T. Stirm, Steven M. Twilegar. Replies due by 11/26/2021.(Naylor, Jacob) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand Ronaldo Arthur Coulter appearing for Plaintiff Robert D. Showalter. Responses due by 11/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Remand)(Coulter, Ronaldo) |
Filing 3 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - On or before November 22, 2021, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/29/2021 09:30 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Pocatello Chambers before Judge David C. Nye. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Boise County, Idaho, Robert T. Holmes, Ryan T. Stirm, Steven M. Twilegar and counsel for Robert D. Showalter, re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/13/2021. (jd) |
RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED (no service document on file, service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (jd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Boise County, case number CV08-21-00197.(Filing fee $402 receipt numberAIDDC-2287052.), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State court complaint #3 Summons for Clerk of Boise County, #4 Summons for Mr. Robert T. Holmes, #5 Summons for Ryan T. Stirm, #6 Summons for Mr. Steven M. Twilegar, #7 Notice of Appearance, #8 State court docket sheet, #9 Certificate of Service)(Naylor, Jacob) Modified on 10/14/2021, to add the names of the attached documents (jd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.