Jaggers v. Liz
Petitioner: Jesse Jaggers and Jesse Ray Jaggers
Respondent: Neville Liz
Case Number: 1:2021cv00421
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: David C Nye
Referring Judge: Raymond Edward Patricco
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2021 Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr no longer assigned to case Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) Modified on 12/9/2021, to remove document and type docket entry order (jd).
December 9, 2021 Filing 8 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER AND REASSIGNMENT ORDER - Petitioners Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is GRANTED. Petitioners entire case shall be reassigned to a United States District Judge to consider de novo whether the Petition is subject to summary dismissal or denial. Petitioner may file a response of no more than 10 pages within 30 days after entry of this Order. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
November 10, 2021 Filing 7 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Attachments: #1 Consent)(lm)
November 2, 2021 Filing 6 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (lm)
October 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Jesse Jaggers Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/28/2021. (kmp)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kmp) Modified on 10/29/2021 to correct docket number (km). Modified on 10/29/2021 (kmp).
October 27, 2021 Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesse Jaggers. (kmp)
October 27, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Jesse Jaggers. Responses due by 11/17/2021 (kmp)
October 27, 2021 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jesse Jaggers.(kmp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaggers v. Liz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse Jaggers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse Ray Jaggers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Neville Liz
Represented By: L LaMont Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?