Wall v. Davis
Robroy Wall Jr. and Robroy Wall, Jr. |
Warden Davis |
1:2021cv00445 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
David C Nye |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:21-cv-00445-DCN. (jd) |
Filing 7 A REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT JUDGE HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE(jd) |
Filing 6 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (kt) |
Filing 5 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kmp) Modified on 11/15/2021 (kmp). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Robroy Wall Jr. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 1/11/2022. (kmp) Modified on 11/15/2021 for corrected docket number(kmp). |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robroy Wall Jr..(kmp) Modified on 11/15/2021 to correct filed date (kmp). |
Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robroy Wall Jr.. (kmp) Modified on 11/15/2021 for correct file date(kmp). |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Robroy Wall Jr.. Responses due by 12/3/2021 (kmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.