Tackett et al v. Murphy et al
Michael Tackett, Karen Tackett and Estate of Ashley Midby |
Daniel James Murphy, SR, Hailey Police Department, Blaine County Sheriff's Office and Bellevue Marshall's Office |
1:2022cv00110 |
March 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Raymond Edward Patricco |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (lm) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Michael J Elia appearing for Defendants Bellevue Marshall's Office, Blaine County Sheriff's Office, Hailey Police Department. Responses due by 5/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Elia, Michael) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Bellevue Marshall's Office, Blaine County Sheriff's Office, Estate of Ashley Midby, Hailey Police Department, Daniel James Murphy, SR, Karen Tackett, Michael Tackett re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,,,, Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 5/9/2022. (lm) |
RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - All Defendants. (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (lm) |
Filing 3 Sealed Document Re: #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,,,,. (Elia, Michael) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,,,, filed by Hailey Police Department, Bellevue Marshall's Office, Blaine County Sheriff's Office. (Elia, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bellevue Marshall's Office, Hailey Police Department, Blaine County Sheriff's Office from Fifth Judicial District, Idaho, case number CV07-20-0530.(Filing fee $402 receipt numberAIDDC-2358831.), filed by Bellevue Marshall's Office, Hailey Police Department, Blaine County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Amended Complaint, #3 State Court Docket, #4 Notice of Appearance, #5 Motion for Protective Order, #6 Memo ISO Motion for Protective Order, #7 Notice of Hearing for PO, #8 Stip to Vacate and Reset Hearing, #9 Order to Vacate and Reset Hearing, #10 Pltfs Memo in Opposition to Motion for PO, #11 Decl of Kreimeyer ISO Pltf Memo in Opp. to PO, #12 Reply Memo ISO PO, #13 Decl of Simms ISO Reply Memo re Protective Order, #14 Motion to Seal, #15 Proposed Order on Motion to Seal, #16 Order re Motion to Seal, #17 Notice of Scheduling Conference, #18 Subpoena Duces Tecum ISP, #19 Answer to Complaint, #20 Notice of Service of Discovery Requests, #21 Memo re Court Ordered Compliance with Subpoena, #22 Decl. of Service ISP, #23 Notice of Service of Response, #24 Decl. of Service Blaine County, #25 Subpoena Blaine County, #26 Scheduling Order, #27 Stipulation re Protective Order, #28 Order re Stip for Protective Order, #29 Notice of Firm Name Change, #30 Stipulation to Extend Disclosure DL, #31 Order re Stip to Extend Disclosure DL, #32 Amended Stip re Extend Disclosures DL, #33 Amended Order re Extend Disclosure DL, #34 Pltf Expert Disclosure, #35 Pltf Motion to to File Amended Complaint, #36 Pltf Memo ISO Motion to File Amended Complaint, #37 Order Granting Motion re Amended Complaint, #38 Summons Bellevue Marshalls Office, #39 Summons Blaine County Sheriffs Office, #40 Summons Hailey PD, #41 Stip to Reset Trial, #42 Order to Reset Trial, #43 Notice of Scheduling Conference, #44 Notice of Appearance Elia, #45 Defs Motion to Dismiss, #46 Memo ISO of Motion to Dismiss)(Elia, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.