Fletcher v. Eaton, et al.
William Fletcher |
Dylan A. Eaton and Parsons Behle & Latimer |
1:2022cv00160 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Raymond Edward Patricco |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER - Fletchers Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is GRANTED. Fletchers Complaint (Dkt. #2 ) is deficient as it fails to state any claims upon which relief can be granted. His Complaint is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court GRANTS Fletcher leave to file an Amended Complaint in compliance with the Courts analysis above. Fletcher must file his Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Order. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) |
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. Wrong deck selected at case opening. Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:22-cv-160-DCN (kmp) |
Filing 3 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (kmp) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Fletcher.(kmp) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William Fletcher. Responses due by 5/2/2022 (kmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.