Woodington v. The Bank of Missouri, et al.
Plaintiff: Stacey Woodington
Defendant: The Bank of Missouri, Synovus Financial Corporation and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv00228
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: David C Nye
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Dawn McCraw. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2428151.)Ryan Ernest Farnsworth appearing for Plaintiff Stacey Woodington. Responses due by 8/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Attorney Admissions)(Farnsworth, Ryan)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER. Equifaxs motion (Dkt. #15 ) is GRANTED, andEquifax shall answer Plaintiffs Complaint or otherwise respond on or before August 1, 2022. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
July 15, 2022 Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) Charles Henry Carpenter appearing for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. Responses due by 8/5/2022 (Carpenter, Charles)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER. Equifaxs motion (Dkt. #11 ) is GRANTED, andEquifax shall answer Plaintiffs Complaint or otherwise respond on or before July 18, 2022. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2022 10:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge David C. Nye. On or before August 4, 2022, the parties must file with the Court the joint LitigationPlan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (alw)
June 27, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Equifax Information Services, LLC re #9 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/26/2022. (alw)
June 24, 2022 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Charles Henry Carpenter appearing for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. Responses due by 7/15/2022 (Carpenter, Charles)
June 24, 2022 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Carpenter, Charles)
June 24, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Henry Carpenter on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC (Carpenter, Charles)
June 24, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for The Bank of Missouri, Stacey Woodington re #1 Complaint, #6 Answer to Complaint Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/23/2022. (alw)
June 23, 2022 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Bank of Missouri. (Fuller, Lyle)
June 23, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Bank of Missouri.(Fuller, Lyle)
June 8, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacey Woodington. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Farnsworth, Ryan)
June 7, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacey Woodington. Synovus Financial Corporation served on 6/2/2022, answer due 6/23/2022. (Farnsworth, Ryan)
June 3, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacey Woodington. The Bank of Missouri served on 6/2/2022, answer due 6/23/2022. (Farnsworth, Ryan)
June 1, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons for Synovus, #2 Summons for the Bank of Missouri)(jd)
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Synovus Financial Corporation, The Bank of Missouri ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2401323.), filed by Stacey Woodington. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Farnsworth, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodington v. The Bank of Missouri, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Woodington
Represented By: Ryan Ernest Farnsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of Missouri
Represented By: Lyle J Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synovus Financial Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Represented By: Charles Henry Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?