Gerdon v. French
Plaintiff: James Alan Gerdon
Defendant: Ren French
Case Number: 1:2022cv00251
Filed: June 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Petitioners Response to the Defendants Motion to Dismiss re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by James Alan Gerdon. Replies due by 8/12/2022.(lm)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Attachments: #1 Consent Filed)(lm)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (lm)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Ren French, James Alan Gerdon re #1 Complaint, #6 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 9/19/2022. (lm)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Responses due by 8/8/2022)Nathan A Austin appearing for Defendant Ren French. (Austin, Nathan)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan A Austin on behalf of Ren French (Austin, Nathan)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Alan Gerdon. Ren French served on 6/27/2022, answer due 7/18/2022. (lm)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE RESETTING HEARING: Telephonic Scheduling Conference reset for 8/31/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Candy W Dale. The parties shall dial 1-669-254-5252, Meeting ID: 161 6744 7776 to join the conference call. (st)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - The Court will conduct a Telephonic Scheduling Conference on August 24, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. On or before August 17, 2022, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT: Cash Fee Received $ 402, receipt # 29951 (kmc)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ren French. (Print attached Summons for service.) (kmc)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ren French , filed by James Alan Gerdon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmc) Modified on 6/21/2022 to correct docket text. (lm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerdon v. French
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Alan Gerdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ren French
Represented By: Nathan A Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?