Shunn v. Davis, et al.
| Forrest Glenn Shunn |
| Davis and Wesseler |
| 1:2022cv00258 |
| June 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Forrest Glenn Shunn Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/22/2022. (kmc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kmc)
|
|
Filing 4
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Forrest Glenn Shunn. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(kmc) Modified on 6/23/2022 to correct the date filed (kmc).
|
|
Filing 3
Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Forrest Glenn Shunn. (kmc)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Forrest Glenn Shunn. Responses due by 7/13/2022 (kmc)
|
|
Filing 1
Application for leave to file a Second or Successive petition by Plaintiff Forrest Glenn Shunn. Responses due by 7/13/2022 (kmc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
