Alesi v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.
1:2022cv00289 |
May 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff may proceed on his First and Eighth Amendments claims against Defendants Rufe, Ayuso, and Fry as described above. All other claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED. If Plain tiff later discovers facts sufficient to support a claim that has been dismissed, Plaintiff may move to amend the complaint to assert such claims. Plaintiff's motions requesting preliminary injunctive relief (Dkts. 6 , 12 , & 13 ) are DENIED w ithout prejudice. Pursuant to General Order 324, this action is hereby returned to the Clerk of Court for random civil case assignment to a presiding judge, on the proportionate basis previously determined by the District Judges, having given due consideration to the existing caseload. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alesi v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.