Jackson v. Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, et al.
Petitioner: Michael E Jackson
Respondent: Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, Twin Falls County Jail and Ivy Medical
Case Number: 1:2022cv00345
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: David C Nye
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Order entered on this date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this entire case is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is also ordered closed. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners 2241 Petition (Dkt. #1 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Petitioner filing a civil rights action to assert his claims. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
August 12, 2022 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Washington Western; Case Number 2:22-cv-01095. Original file with documents numbered 1 - 4, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER TO DISTRICT OF IDAHO, by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (ST)
August 4, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Document(s). ***Action Required*** 2241/2254 Filing Fee Not Paid.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 9/6/2022 to correct IFP application. (cc: petitioner w/IFP form via USPS) (ST)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 PROPOSED 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner Michael E Jackson. (NO IFP/NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit in Support of Petition, #3 Letter from Filer)(ST)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael E Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Twin Falls County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ivy Medical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?