Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bell Semiconductor, LLC
Defendant: Micron Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00375
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Debora K Grasham
Referring Judge: David C Nye
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER. Based upon the stipulation of the parties (Dkt. #15 ), Defendant shall have until October 31, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (bb)
September 26, 2022 Filing 15 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Stipulation Re: Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (McLaughlin, Alexander)
September 19, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Bell Semiconductor, LLC and counsel for Micron Technology, Inc. re #7 Notice of Appearance and #1 Complaint. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 11/18/2022. (jd)
September 19, 2022 Filing 13 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #9 , #10 , #11 and #12 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Jared Bobrow,Jeremy Jason Lang,Jingyuan Luo and Tammy Su for Micron Technology, Inc. Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
September 16, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Tammy Su. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2451709.)Teague Ian Donahey appearing for Defendant Micron Technology, Inc.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Donahey, Teague)
September 16, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Jingyuan Luo. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2451704.)Teague Ian Donahey appearing for Defendant Micron Technology, Inc.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Donahey, Teague)
September 16, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Jeremy Jason Lang. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2451703.)Teague Ian Donahey appearing for Defendant Micron Technology, Inc.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Donahey, Teague)
September 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Jared Bobrow. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2451698.)Teague Ian Donahey appearing for Defendant Micron Technology, Inc.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Donahey, Teague)
September 16, 2022 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Micron Technology, Inc.. (Donahey, Teague)
September 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Teague Ian Donahey on behalf of Micron Technology, Inc. (Donahey, Teague)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Micron Technology, Inc. served on 9/9/2022, answer due 9/30/2022. (McLaughlin, Alexander)
August 29, 2022 Filing 5 DOCKET ORDER OF RECUSAL: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 455(a), the undersigned Magistrate Judge hereby issues this order recusing herself from any further proceedings in this matter. The Clerk is directed to reassign this matter to another judge. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (lat)
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Micron Technology, Inc. (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd)
August 29, 2022 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action, patent no. U.S. 7,260,803 and U.S. 7,149,989. (Notice sent to USPTO) (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (jd)
August 29, 2022 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:22-cv-00375-DCN. (jd)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bell Semiconductor, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Hilco IP Merchant Capital, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco Patent Acquisition 56, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco, Inc. for Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (McLaughlin, Alexander)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Micron Technology, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2442427.), filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark)(McLaughlin, Alexander)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bell Semiconductor, LLC
Represented By: Alexander P. McLaughlin
Represented By: Jason Blakley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Micron Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Jared Bobrow
Represented By: Jason Lang
Represented By: Jingyuan Luo
Represented By: Tammy Su
Represented By: Teague Ian Donahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?