Allen v. Valley et al
| Zachary Tyler Allen |
| Randall L. Valley, Timothy Richardson, Sgt. Josiah Sneider, Sara Lough, Idaho State Correctional Institution, DW Tim Mckay, AW David E. Dietz, Sgt. Miller, Cpl. Stappel Noble, Sgt. Bonjovi, CO John Baker, ISCC and All Successors in Office |
| 1:2022cv00401 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 Complaint, #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zachary Tyler Allen. (Attachments: #1 Fax Cover Sheet)(lm) |
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
| Filing 3 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (lm) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Zachary Tyler Allen. Responses due by 10/12/2022 (Attachments: #1 Account Activity)(lm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Fax Cover Sheet, #2 Concern Forms, #3 Exhibit A Evidence, #4 Prisoner Concern Forms)(lm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
